ÃÃÍÅÊÓƵ

August 5, 2020

Remote interpreting services are essential for people with limited English — during COVID-19 and beyond

Interpreters are a critical part of health care for people with limited English. The shift to remote interpreting during COVID-19 could ensure more Australians who need these services can access them.

According to , 3.5% of Australians have limited English proficiency.

When they’re receiving health care, it’s essential these Australians have access to interpreters. Research has shown facilitate effective communication between the patient and clinician, boost the quality of care, and improve the patient’s health outcomes.

With COVID-19, we’ve seen a shift towards interpreting services being delivered remotely.

These remote services are important for vulnerable groups during the pandemic. They should also pave the way for improved care for people with limited English in the future.

---

Read more:

---

The importance of interpreters during COVID-19

Certain groups of people are at of serious illness from COVID-19. These include people aged 70 and over (or 65 and over with a chronic medical condition), Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 50 and over with a chronic condition, and people with compromised immune systems.

Vulnerability can also relate to factors like homelessness or insecure housing and socioeconomic status.

Many people with limited English proficiency will fit into these vulnerable groups.

People with limited English may also be at increased risk of COVID-19 because they don’t have to understand and respond to pandemic-related information.

 

While data on language and COVID-19 cases is regrettably , evidence from overseas suggests people from non-English-speaking backgrounds may be faring worse.

In the United States, for example, communities with large numbers of people with limited English account for a of COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, disproportionate to the general population.

So as well as providing suitable health messaging to multilingual communities, providing interpreting services is vitally important at this time.

---

Read more:

---

Interpreters are underused across health care

Independent of the pandemic, evidence suggests interpreters are underused in health-care settings in Australia.

In acute care, for example, found 54% of hospital patients who required an interpreter received one. But this rate is considerably higher than those reported in .

Professional interpreters are also underused in and settings in Australia.

We don’t know how often interpreters are used in , but there’s clearly a need there too.

COVID-19 gives us an opportunity to improve the use of interpreters in these areas.

A shift to remote delivery

Before the pandemic, professional interpreting services in health care were delivered through a combination of face-to-face and remote services (via telephone or video conferencing).

In Australia, these services are made available through a range of private and government-funded services. For example, in New South Wales there are five . Nationally, the Department of Home Affairs funds the Translating and Interpreting Service , which offers free interpreting for eligible health organisations and clinicians.

---

Read more:

---

There are no data from before COVID-19 to tell us what proportion of interpreting services were delivered face-to-face, rather than remotely. But during the pandemic, consistent with the sharp , we’ve seen a sudden shift to remote delivery of interpreting services across Australia.

At the for example, video interpreting appointments have increased from 10-15 appointments per month before COVID-19 to 100-200 a month currently.

There are pros and cons

Research shows remote interpreting is an and to face-to-face interpreting.

Importantly, it allows for continued access to services in a COVID-safe way (minimising physical contact between interpreters, health-care professionals and consumers).

Other benefits include rapid and increased access to interpreters in a wide range of languages, and . It allows interpreters to spend more time interpreting rather than commuting between sites.

 

But there are also some potential disadvantages. There’s the absence of visual communication, especially associated with . A person might offer cues via their body language, but a telephone consultation will miss these.

Drawbacks could also include such as poor video or audio quality, and issues related to digital literacy and participation more broadly, particularly for .

---

Read more:

---

An opportunity to improve care

The rapid transition in service delivery necessitated by COVID-19 presents an opportunity for systemic change to professional interpreting services.

To ensure safe, quality care is provided during the pandemic, and to capitalise on the opportunity COVID-19 has afforded for improved care into the future, we need to see several things happen:

• all health-care personnel providing services to people with limited English proficiency should take up appropriate remote interpreting services

• providers and staff should undergo training to increase familiarity with available technology and ensure its appropriate use

• health services’ rates of remote interpreting uptake should be measured and reported as an indicator of access

• barriers to the use of remote interpreting services should be explored to ensure they’re addressed and overcome

• cost and effectiveness of remote delivery should be further evaluated. This includes comparing modes (for example, telephone versus video) to inform best practice and policy.

, Associate Professor, School of Medicine,

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

ÃÃÍÅÊÓƵ academics exercise academic freedom by providing expert commentary, opinion and analysis on a range of ongoing social issues and current affairs. This expert commentary reflects the views of those individual academics and does not necessarily reflect the views or policy positions of the ÃÃÍÅÊÓƵ.